Straw Buyer Fraud

| | Comments (5)

I've gotten several emails to articles recently having to do with straw buyers, and more search hits. Red flags preceded home-fraud lawsuit and Fraud case hits home seem to cover one of these weasels particularly well.



A "straw buyer" is someone whose credit is used to purchase a property and secure financing. Sometimes they cooperate willingly and sometimes they are victims of identity theft, but it's always illegal. It is also, as these two articles illustrate, hazardous to your financial health.



Person A wants to buy a property, but convinces person B to step in as a "straw buyer" to obtain terms that person A could not. Alternatively, person A steals person B's identity, and forges all of their information on the purchase and loan papers. In both cases, person B is not the person really purchasing the property, but their name is on the mortgage. In the first case, person B is fully responsible for the loan and everything else that goes on, as well as having committed FRAUD. In the second case, they've got a long hard row to hoe to convince everyone that they weren't involved, because with hundreds of thousands of dollars on the line, it is worth the lender's while to be as hard-nosed as possible. The lender does not particularly care about justice in this case; what they want is the money they loaned out to get repaid.



The closest thing to benign that happens in straw buyers is when one relative, let's call him Junior, convinces another relative, call her Mom, to use her good credit so that Junior can afford the payments on a house he really does want to live in. Please note that this is still fraud - you are deceiving the lender for the purpose of getting a better loan than you would otherwise be able to obtain. Good agents and good loan officers want no part of this, because it doesn't matter how benign the intent, the fact of the matter is that it is still fraud. The lender discovers it, or if payments get missed, that agent or loan officer is legally toast. Note that this is different from Mom buying Junior a property for Junior to live in, or helping Junior afford property Junior wants to buy. There is sometimes a thin but always bright line between legal and illegal activity, and starting to deceive people - telling anything less than the whole truth and nothing but the truth - is always a sign you have stepped over the line.



Now, once you get away from this most nearly benign straw buyer scenario, things degenerate quickly and there are many scams and frauds that can be pulled. Many of them involve appraisal fraud. Most common is that someone persuades you to allow them to apply for a loan on your behalf to buy a property for them, which has supposedly appraised for $700,000. You end up responsible for a $700,000 loan on a $400,000 property, and the people who pull this scam walk away with $300,000 (or more) free and clear.



There are also all kinds of scams involved with people that want someone else on the mortgage, but themselves on title. If you quitclaim off of title, this does not absolve you from the mortgage. In general, the only way to absolve yourself from the mortgage is for them to refinance in their own name, and since they are claiming they couldn't do this, that just isn't going to happen. It's one thing for one spouse to qualify for the mortgage on their own but legally quitclaim it themselves and their spouse, husband and wife as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. It is something else entirely to quitclaim it to Joe Blow (or Jane Blow), but allow yourself to remain on the mortgage. If Mr. or Mrs. Blow does not pay the mortgage, guess who is liable? I get hits on this site every day asking, "How do I remove myself from a mortgage?" The answer is that you don't. The lender has your signature on the dotted line that says "I agree to pay..." The only way they are going to let you off is if the people remaining qualify for the loan without you - by which I mean a refinance. Even most loan assumptions (for loans where assumption is possible and approved) are subject to recourse for at least two years, usually longer. This is one reason that for divorcing couples, it needs to be part of the dissolution agreement that the property will be sold or mortgage refinanced before the dissolution is final to protect the spouse that isn't keeping the property (they're often entitled to some cash from the equity, as well).



There are good and strong reasons why straw buyers are illegal, reasons that start at fraud and run through confidence games of all sorts, which are also fraud, albeit with a personal as opposed to corporate victim. The games that can be played on you when you cooperate with a straw buyer request start at major financial disaster, and often include felony jail time.



Caveat Emptor

UPDATED here

Categories

Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

5 Comments

Mortgage fraud is a big problem and growing. I went to a local real estate investor meeting a few weeks ago that featured a prosecutor from the state. According to him, he has 30 cases ready to file in King County (Seattle) area alone. And the cases in the queue are in the hundreds.

David Morales said:

what is the lender is aware that a strawbuyer is being used? does the lender forfeit the mortgage or is the subsequent lien rendered void or voidable? because the homestead is not really the borrowers?

Dan Melson Author Profile Page said:

Usually it gets discovered in the underwriting process, with bad results for loan officer and often real estate agent as well. Aiding and abetting fraud is a lose your license complaint.

If it does get funded, the lender forfeits nothing. It's a valid lien and they can do everything they normally could, PLUS come after everybody involved in the FRAUD. Even if the loan would normally have been non-recourse, the act of committing FRAUD makes it full recourse.

The lender offers the rates and terms available to owner occupied residential dwellings because there is less chance of default on them than anything else. If you lie to secure a benefit you are not entitled to, THAT IS FRAUD.

Olen Soifer said:

In the current financial crisis, a lot of people are raving about "straw buyers" in connection with mortgage fraud. But, it is unfortunate those pontifications disseminate wrong information. The primary purpose for using a straw buyer is to conceal the ultimate user/purchaser of a property. While the practice may be called subterfuge, the statement that a straw buyer is always committing an illegal act is as preposterous as saying that shooting someone is always illegal.

It is illegal, on its face, to use forged documentation, or that which belongs to someone else, to obtain a mortgage approval. The fraud is the use of phony documents, or one of conspiracy with an illegal intent to deceive another. The borrower, who obtains a mortgage on false pretenses, is guilty of perjury. The person, who lends their identity with the intent to deceive a third party, is also a perjurer, as well as an illegal coconspirator. But, in the case of the buyer retaining the property, it isn't even a correct use of the term, "straw buyer", even though their actions are criminal.

When a straw buyer claims that they intend to occupy the property, but they do not, that is perjury and a fraud. Again, the fraud is the lie about their intent to occupy, NOT that the buyer gave no advance disclosure of their intent to transfer ownership after the settlement.

When a straw buyer obtains a loan to purchase a property, and then transfers title without paying back the loan, that is a breach of the loan contract (mortgages), if it contains a due-on-sale clause, as most do. The breach of contract is the issue, NOT that the buyer didn't give advance disclosure of their intent to transfer ownership after the settlement. In this case, if the lender was foolish enough to fail to include a due-of-sale clause, or other prohibition on assignment/assumption of the loan...they might not even have any case for griping about the transfer of title.

The term "straw buyer" has come to be associated with mortgage fraud, but it should be obvious that the term may have little or nothing to do with the frauds that are being committed. The use of straw buyers has long been used to conceal when a single entity was trying to accumulate property without causing a jump in the sales prices of the property. Take, for example, the accumulation of land by the Walt Disney Company in contemplation of what has become Florida's Disney World. In accumulating the property, WDC used numerous straw buyers. Now, it is understandable that land-sellers in the area might have been upset because they accepted a lower price than they might have insisted upon, had they been aware of the land-grab. But, the use of the straw buyers was totally legitimate, even if the sellers thought it was underhanded. In reality, unless they are tied in with some sort of fraud, straw buyers are about as illegal as retailers who don't voluntarily disclose their wholesale prices to their retail customers.

Unfortunately, the original rant, above, equates the use of a straw buyer with fraudulent docs our conspiritorial actions with the intent to deceive a lender. Assuming an automatic connection is preposterous. It is not the straw buyer that is the illegal entity, but the liars, fraudsters and conspirators who are the criminals. I won't get personal, here, but I suggest you get down off of your high horse and your soapbox and get your terms right before you accuse the wrong people of the wrong crime.

Dan Melson Author Profile Page said:

When Walt Disney used this trick in Florida, what you call "straw buyers" were real. They took title themselves before transferring it. Furthermore, the loans were always in the proper entities name - they didn't use someone else's credit (i.e. Disney) to get the loan. There is a difference between a stalking horse and a straw buyer.

Furthermore, if you compare the relative frequency of stalking horse (where they want to keep it quiet exactly who is really behind all of the purchases, but still perform the transactions truthfully) versus straw buyer where they pretend the buyer is someone other than who it really is for purposes of getting a better deal from the LENDER, you will find that the latter is dozens if not hundreds of times more common. Stalking horse is legal if ethically debateable (I think they're a pretty light shade of gray - the owner agreed to that contract of their own free will, so they must have been getting something they saw as worth at least as much as the property). Straw buyers are both illegal and unethical.

Please be civil. Avoid profanity - I will delete the vast majority of it, usually by deleting the entire comment. To avoid comment spam, a comments account is required. They are freely available, and you can post comments immediately. Alternatively, you may use your Type Key registration, or sign up for one (They work at most Movable Type sites) All comments made are licensed to the site, but the fact that a comment has been allowed to remain should not be taken as an endorsement from me or the site. There is no point in attempting to foster discussion if only my own viewpoint is to be permitted. If you believe you see something damaging to you or some third party, I will most likely delete it upon request.
Logical failures (straw man, ad hominem, red herring, etcetera) will be pointed out - and I hope you'll point out any such errors I make as well. If there's something you don't understand, ask.
Nonetheless, the idea of comments should be constructive. Aim them at the issue, not the individual. Consider it a challenge to make your criticism constructive. Try to be respectful. Those who make a habit of trollish behavior will be banned.

Leave a comment

Copyright 2005-2014 Dan Melson All Rights Reserved

Search my sites or the web!
 
Web www.searchlightcrusade.net
www.danmelson.com


Buy My Science Fiction Novels!
Dan Melson Author Page

The Man From Empire
Man From Empire Cover

A Guardian From Earth
Guardian From Earth Cover

Empire and Earth
Empire and Earth Cover

Working The Trenches
Working The Trenches Cover

--Blogads--

blog advertising
--Blogads--

blog advertising --Blogads--
**********


C'mon! I need to pay for this website! If you want to buy or sell Real Estate in San Diego County, or get a loan anywhere in California, contact me! I cover San Diego County in person and all of California via internet, phone, fax, and overnight mail. If you want a loan or need a real estate agent
Professional Contact Information

Questions regarding this website:
Contact me!
dm (at) searchlight crusade (dot) net

(Eliminate the spaces and change parentheticals to the symbols, of course)

Essay Requests

Yes, I do topic requests and questions!

If you don't see an answer to your question, please consider asking me via email. I'll bet money you're not the only one who wants to know!

Requests for reprint rights, same email: dm (at) searchlight crusade (dot) net!
-----------------
Learn something that will save you money?
Want to motivate me to write more articles?
Just want to say "Thank You"?

Aggregators

Add this site to Technorati Favorites
Blogroll Me!
Subscribe with Bloglines



Powered by FeedBlitz


Most Recent Posts
Subscribe to Searchlight Crusade
http://www.wikio.com

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Dan Melson published on October 4, 2006 10:01 AM.

Links and Minifeatures 10 03 Tuesday was the previous entry in this blog.

Unpaid Liens After The Sale, and Subrogation is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

-----------------
Advertisement
-----------------

My Links