Saving the Real Estate Agency Profession in the Era of Free Information
I try not to do a lot of "business of real estate" posts. That's not what I'm about. But I figure that we (as agents) have got about a year to save the profession from the traditional brokerages that control the National Association of Realtors.
Last night I attended a session of the San Diego Weblogging group. Being the only non-techie present, when real estate came up they were willing to be quite upfront about their reactions to real estate. When I said "everything is a matter of public record," in a different context, the entire group went off on me about NAR's policy of attempting to control information chokepoints via MLS and limiting what information IDX is allowed to display.
(For those who were present last night, I want to emphasize in no uncertain terms that the your reaction was a good thing from my point of view. I knew intellectually what the public thought about this policy, while not having precisely this sort of eye opening experience about how strong those feelings were. But having the cover of the group and a lone agent to target, you folks felt comfortable displaying exactly what you thought of this policy to that agent: me. The shortsighted reaction would be to get angry and offended and leave. The intelligent reaction is to thank you for providing concrete perspective on something I already knew intellectually, because I am grateful for you all completely clearing the air, and I'm glad it happened.)
For those who weren't present, this is a group of very bright, very intelligent people. It's only small fraction of the number of such people here locally. All over the country are similar groups of very bright, very intelligent people. They've got brains, they've got know-how, they've got marketing expertise and access to venture capital. It is only a matter of time before some group of them figures out how to defeat any MLS monopoly of listing information. Not that there's much of one right now, where MLS information goes out complete to IDX providers and parts are only censored to the general public because it's in the license. But eventually, what shreds of information monopoly are left will be gone. The only thing that needs to remain restricted is, as we all agreed, the showing instructions. Things like lockbox combos and when people are not going to be home so the criminal element can't cart their stuff off. CBB? It's valid information on the state of their agent's mind for buyers. Show it. Contact phone for showing? Show it. Days on market? Definitely show it.
One of the people that was present works for a large IDX provider. We had a good conversation about how even the traditional brokerages are loosening information flow in the name of selling real estate right now. We agreed that it was likely that there will be attempts to re-tighten this control in the future, but that those attempts are going to flat-out fail.
Now, let me tell you something else: While these folks were vehemently hostile to the notion peddled by the traditional minded brokerage controlling market access, they were quite open and responsive to the notion of the expert consultant.
Unfortunately, these folks were all previously unacquainted with that business model. There's a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there about the business of real estate agency. A lot of it's written by people outside the business who want a piece of the action, to encourage an agenda that gives them a piece of the action. The experiences of these folks leads them to be deeply suspicious of large corporations and large organizations with a profit motive.
NAR, for their part, is playing straight into the hands of these people outside the business who want a piece of the action. The entire "controlling market access and information chokepoints" message is anathema to these folks. It tells them that agents and their organizations aren't to be trusted, it tells them that our entire business model is based upon making money by constraining people to come to us. What happens when that constraint vanishes? I guarantee that it will vanish. If not this year, than next year or the year after. Precisely when isn't important. It's coming, and probably sooner than you - or I - think. Agents can decide to anticipate this event as a group, and prosper, or lose almost the entire market when it does happen.
Let's look at the basic inalienable facts of the situation. You have John and Jane Smith. They're looking to buy a house. This is the biggest financial transaction of their lives, and purchasing real estate is an enormously complex transaction they have no real understanding of. They're coming into the market innocent of any real knowledge of trends, or where the market is. They have seen none of the recent sales in the neighborhood. They have no idea how to evaluate a property for future suitability, investment potential, or any number of other things. Do you think people might be willing to pay for all that knowledge and judgment, and know-how? Now consider: If we market ourselves by telling them they have to come to us because we have a monopoly on information of what houses are for sale, what happens when we don't? Crickets chirp, tumbleweeds roll, and 99.9999 percent of all agents go out of business. Market yourself by sending the message that your value is in control of market access, and what happens when your control of market access goes away?
Let's look on the other side of the equation as well, at sellers. You have John and Jane Smith, a few years later. They've decided to sell for some reason or another - there are at least eight categories of reasons. Now they've got a long grocery list of factors that they've never before considered to deal with in selling that property. Time constraints, property constraints, competition constraints, staging, location, construction, layout, the loan, the lender, the market they're in. Do you think people might similarly be willing to pay for expertise in dealing with all of that? But most ways of marketing that agents do boil down to "Our MLS is where all the buyers are." What happens when it isn't? RIAA is learning this lesson right now, and they have a lot more law on their side than agents do.
Or maybe we're all going down the "constrained to deal with an agent by force of law" argument? All it takes is one licensed agent to put themselves into the deal, and the traditional brokerages have made it trivial to get that license as the way to keep themselves in clueless newbies. Not to mention that most states, including all of the big ones, don't have such laws, and passing them in current environment falls under the heading of "Not Gonna Happen." The few states that have such laws are going to wake up and repeal them eventually.
The "sign in the yard, entry in MLS" listing agent is going to go away no matter what we do. So is the "here is the living room" buyer's agent. Where there is no real value provided, people will go with the cheapest alternative, and you can't stay in such a business competing with "essentially free"
But good agents do provide value, and even more so when there's no agent on the other side. My average for the buyers that are the majority of my business in the last two years is almost twenty percent of the value. Let the people be free not to use any agent if they don't want to. It just makes my clients happier. Let your happy clients tell their friends, and there won't be any shortage of business.
For those agents who can compete with all possible alternatives, it would be a lot easier to attract business if we didn't have to compete by first defusing official NAR pronouncements that are nonsense, and sabotage our efforts by telling the public that the value of an agent is in places where it clearly no longer is. We are entering a new world of information transparency whether we like it or not. I've decided that I like it very much - basic information may be free, but context, analysis, and evaluation are more valuable than ever because of it. But try and charge toll for that basic information, and people will figure out how to route around you.
Categories
Transparency vs. Privacyblog advertising
--Blogads--
blog advertising --Blogads--
C'mon! I need to pay for this website! If you want to buy or sell Real Estate in San Diego County, or get a loan anywhere in California, contact me! I cover San Diego County in person and all of California via internet, phone, fax, and overnight mail.
Professional Contact Information
**********
Contact me! dm (at) searchlight crusade (dot) net (Eliminate the spaces and change parentheticals to the symbols, of course)
If you don't see an answer to your question, please consider asking me via email. dm (at) searchlightcrusade (dot) net. I'll bet money you're not the only one who wants to know!
Requests for reprint rights, contact dm (at) searchlightcrusade (dot) net!
Essay Requests
Add this site to Technorati Favorites
Subscribe to Searchlight Crusade
My Links
-
Heavy Lifters
- Instapundit
- Michelle Malkin
- Scrappleface
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Hot Air
- Wizbang
- Victor Davis Hanson
- Q and O L
- Eject! Eject! Eject!
- Michael Barone
- The Victory Caucus Places I get to as often as I can
- Icerocket
- MEMRI
- Soldier's Angels
- Technorati
- Transparency International
- Wide Awakes
- The Anchoress
- Argghhh! R
- Armies of Liberation R
- Asymmetrical Information
- Austin Bay
- Belmont Club
- Big Lizards
- Tim Blair
- Dr. Sanity
- Kevin Drum
- Gateway Pundit
- Hugh Hewitt
- Iraq the Model
- Jeff Jarvis
- Jihad Watch
- Little Green Footballs
- Mudville Gazette
- Neo-neocon
- WSJ OpinionJournal
- Powerline
- Protein Wisdom
- Real Clear Politics
- Mark Steyn
- Strategy Page
- Don Surber R
- Vodkapundit
- Watching America
- Michael Yon Personal Finance, Economics and Business Sites
- Bloodhound Blog
- Consumerism Commentary
- Eidelblog L
- The Entrepreneurial Mind
- Expert Real Estate Louisville
- Financial Rounds
- Free Money Financea>
- In Cash Flow We Trust
- I Will Teach You To Be Rich
- Mortgage Cicerone
- Mortgage Fraud Blog
- No Credit Needed
- Personal Finance Advice
- pfblogs.org
- Students for Saving Social Security Other sites I've linked and visit
- Accuracy In Media
- Ace of Spades
- The Agitator
- Ann Althouse
- The Anarchangel L
- Angry in the Great White North L
- Antigravitas L
- The Anti Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Atlas Shrugs
- Professor Bainbridge R
- Baldilocks
- Barcepundit
- Beldar
- Below The Beltway L
- Blackfive
- The Buck Stops Here
- Chapomatic
- Chequer-Board of Nights & Days
- Classical Values R
- Combs Spouts Off L
- Countertop Chronicles R
- Coyote Blog
- Daily Howler
- Daily Pundit R
- David's Medienkritic
- Dean's World R
- Decision '08 R
- De Doc L
- Brad DeLong
- Different River
- Digger's Realm R
- Done With Mirrors R
- Drudge Report
- DUmmie FUnnies
- enrevanche R
- Eschaton
- Evolution R
- Fearless Philosophy L
- Generation Why?"
- Happycrow's Eyeball Factory L
- Hold The Mayo L
- Huffington Post
- IMAO
- INDC Journal R
- Iowahawk
- It Comes In Pints?"
- The Jawa Report R
- Just One Minute
- Justus for All R
- Kausfiles
- Ezra Klein
- Daily Kos
- La Shawn Barber
- Libertarian Leanings R
- Liberty Papers
- Carol Platt Liebau
- Llama Butchers R
- Mensa Barbie
- The Moderate Voice
- Broadband Politics
- Mr. Completely L
- National Review Online
- No Angst Zone L
- Normblog
- Brendan Nyhan
- Ogre's Politics & Views L
- One Fine Jay R
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Peter Porcupine L
- Political Calculations
- Radio Equalizer
- Reasoned Audacity
- Respectful Insolence R
- Rhymes with Right L
- Riehl World View
- Right Place
- Right Wing Nut House
- ROFASix
- Samizdata
- SCOTUS Blog
- Roger L. Simon
- Stop the ACLU
- The Strata-Sphere R
- TacJammer
- TalkLeft
- Tempus Fugit
- Texas Best Grok L
- Tigerhawk
- Tinkerty-Tonk R
- Tom Rants RL
- Unalienable Right
- Unrepentant Individual L
- Villainous Company
- Oliver Willis
- Willisms
- The World According to Nick R San Diego Bloggers
- Ducksnorts
- Edward O'Connor
- Inside the Rabbit Hole
- Matt Browne
- Eric Bidwell '08
- San Diego Gaslamp and
- San Diego Home Blog
- San Diego Momma
- San Diego Traveler
- Shy Cloud
- Sociosophy
- Thaumatocracy
- Luke Stardust Link Exchanges, etcetera
- DANEgerus R
- A Dollop of Sour Cream
- Dust My Broom L
- Generic Confusion R
- Grim's Hall
- Heartless Libertarian L
- individ L
- Kesher Talk R
- Leaning Toward The Dark Side R
- Medary L
- Mondo QT L
- Nose On Your Face R
- Pererro R
- Pratie Place
- Random Fate R
- Ravings of John C. A. Bambanek L
- Signifying Nothing R
- The Skwib L
- Tel-Chai Nation
- TF Sterns Rantings L
- Windypundit L Consumer and Research Sites
- Better Business Bureau
- Consumer Reports
- NASD Home
- California Department of Real Estate
- California Licensee Lookup
- California Department of Insurance
- National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
- Do Not Call Homepage
- IRS Charities Search
- Internet Fraud Complaint Center
- SEC Home Page
- Stop Mortgage Fraud
- Report Mortgage Fraud Debunking Many so-called Real Estate Gurus
- John T. Reed Other research
- FactCheck.org
- Babel Fish Translation
- Snopes Worthwhile Web Comics
- Sluggy Freelance
- Day by Day
- User Friendly
- Kevin and Kell It is site policy to list the main page of every site I reference. Sometimes the real world intervenes and I haven't gotten to it yet, or one falls through the cracks on a long post with multiple references. It is also site policy to list the main page of every site that lists this one on their equivalent roll, as well as the main page of all sites that are members of any of the same groups this site is a member of. Please send me an email with a link to the main page of your site if I've overlooked you (dm at the domain name). For the clue-challenged, note that it is a requirement for your link to appear on every page of your site, just like mine does, and I will not link to spam sites. Honor Roll of Sites Banned by Paranoid Repressive Governments: (be the first on your block to submit a link!)


Logical failures (straw man, ad hominem, red herring, etcetera) will be pointed out - and I hope you'll point out any such errors I make as well. If there's something you don't understand, ask.
Nonetheless, the idea of comments should be constructive. Aim them at the issue, not the individual. Consider it a challenge to make your criticism constructive. Try to be respectful. Those who make a habit of trollish behavior will be banned.
Leave a comment