Links and Minifeatures 2008 08 18 Monday
Kathleen Parker illustrates in three quick emails the responses of George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and John McCain to Russia's Georgian aggression.
Well, duh: Bush accuses Russia of 'bullying and intimidation'
President Bush on Friday accused Russia of "bullying and intimidation" in its harsh military treatment of Georgia, saying the people in the former Soviet republic have chosen freedom and "we will not cast them aside."Bush ratcheted up his rhetoric against Moscow as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was in Tbilisi, Georgia to pursue a diplomatic solution to the week-old crisis. Standing alongside Rice, pro-Western President Mikhail Saakashvili said he had signed a cease-fire agreement with Russia that protects Georgia's interests despite concessions to Moscow.
The problem is that President Bush appears to be just saying that, as opposed to doing anything about it. Of course, if Russia in committed to making contests into military ones, that trumps all other methods of dealing with a problem, at least in the short term. And President Bush is more than a little circumscribed by the current political situation.
Given the current situation in Georgia, is there much doubt what they're really saying?
Russia: Poland risks attack because of US missiles
A top Russian general said Friday that Poland's agreement to accept a U.S. missile interceptor base exposes the ex-communist nation to attack, possibly by nuclear weapons, the Interfax news agency reported.
The system scheduled for installation has no offensive capability worth mentioning. Yeah, it would be a bummer for those involved if a fragment of a missile came down on an enemy tank, but that would be a freak coincidence and it's not designed to damage anything but other missiles. All it really does is defend against incoming missile assaults, and if a certain unnamed country east of Poland has no intention of bombarding Poland with missiles, it makes no real difference to the situation. Worth making a fuss over? Not in the least, in that situation.
But a certain country to the east of Poland is making a big fuss. Appears to me like Russia threatened Poland with nukes while preserving a thin veneer of deniability of having made such a threat.
"Poland, by deploying (the system) is exposing itself to a strike - 100 percent," Nogovitsyn, the deputy chief of staff, was quoted as saying.
100 percent? Sounds like they know where such a strike would be coming from. Estonia? Doubt it. Belarus? Almost certainly not. Hungary? I don't think so. What is the one nation with nuclear weapons that has invaded Poland multiple times in the last century (Minimum of twice, in 1920 and 1939, and could be five or more times, depending upon how you count)? Hint: It's not Pakistan. And no, I'm not talking about the tourists in Krakow and Warsaw, either. Military force invading upon explicit instructions of their government. Do you think the government of such a country might have a vested military interest in Poland being unable to defend itself against atomic aggression? And why might they consider themselves to have such a vested interest? If they had no interest in invading Poland - again - there's no reason to get antsy about it and make threats.
Here's another hint: What still extant countries participated in the most brazen land grab of the last five hundred years, one bold enough to make our own western settlers blush with shame (as well as a major reason why the US has the Polish descended population it does)? Which still extant country considers Poland part of its Empire? I'll even make it easy for you: Run "Poland Partition" through a search engine of your choice. How about "Solidarity Trade Union" Ringing any bells yet?
At a news conference earlier Friday, Nogovitsyn had reiterated Russia's frequently stated warning that placing missile-defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic would bring an unspecified military response. But his subsequent reported statement substantially stepped up a war of words.
I am Russia, hear me roar!
But what happens if Poland gives them what they want today? Do they have to listen closer, or do they have more independence of action with a missile defense? I submit that it's the latter - which is why Russia doesn't want them to have it.
A credible report of Russia conducting ethnic cleansing
Categories
Zee Links and Minifeaturesblog advertising
--Blogads--
blog advertising --Blogads--
C'mon! I need to pay for this website! If you want to buy or sell Real Estate in San Diego County, or get a loan anywhere in California, contact me! I cover San Diego County in person and all of California via internet, phone, fax, and overnight mail.
Professional Contact Information
**********
dm (at) searchlight crusade (dot) net
(Eliminate the spaces and change parentheticals to the symbols, of course)
Essay Requests
If you don't see an answer to your question, please consider asking me via email. I'll bet money you're not the only one who wants to know!
Requests for reprint rights, same email: dm (at) searchlight crusade (dot) net!
Add this site to Technorati Favorites
Subscribe to Searchlight Crusade
My Links
-
Heavy Lifters
- Instapundit
- Michelle Malkin
- Scrappleface
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Hot Air
- Wizbang
- Victor Davis Hanson
- Q and O L
- Eject! Eject! Eject!
- Michael Barone
- The Victory Caucus Places I get to as often as I can
- Icerocket
- MEMRI
- Soldier's Angels
- Technorati
- Transparency International
- Wide Awakes
- The Anchoress
- Argghhh! R
- Armies of Liberation R
- Asymmetrical Information
- Austin Bay
- Belmont Club
- Big Lizards
- Tim Blair
- Dr. Sanity
- Kevin Drum
- Gateway Pundit
- Hugh Hewitt
- Iraq the Model
- Jeff Jarvis
- Jihad Watch
- Little Green Footballs
- Mudville Gazette
- Neo-neocon
- WSJ OpinionJournal
- Powerline
- Protein Wisdom
- Real Clear Politics
- Mark Steyn
- Strategy Page
- Don Surber R
- Vodkapundit
- Watching America
- Michael Yon Personal Finance, Economics and Business Sites
- Bloodhound Blog
- Blueprint For Financial Prosperity
- Consumerism Commentary
- Eidelblog L
- The Entrepreneurial Mind
- Expert Real Estate Louisville
- Financial Rounds
- Free Money Financea>
- In Cash Flow We Trust
- I Will Teach You To Be Rich
- Mortgage Cicerone
- Mortgage Fraud Blog
- No Credit Needed
- Personal Finance Advice
- pfblogs.org
- Students for Saving Social Security Other sites I've linked and visit
- Accuracy In Media
- Ace of Spades
- The Agitator
- Ann Althouse
- The Anarchangel L
- Angry in the Great White North L
- Antigravitas L
- The Anti Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Atlas Shrugs
- Professor Bainbridge R
- Baldilocks
- Barcepundit
- Beldar
- Below The Beltway L
- Blackfive
- The Buck Stops Here
- Chapomatic
- Chequer-Board of Nights & Days
- Classical Values R
- Combs Spouts Off L
- Countertop Chronicles R
- Coyote Blog
- Daily Howler
- Daily Pundit R
- David's Medienkritic
- Dean's World R
- Decision '08 R
- De Doc L
- Brad DeLong
- Different River
- Digger's Realm R
- Done With Mirrors R
- Drudge Report
- DUmmie FUnnies
- enrevanche R
- Eschaton
- Evolution R
- Fearless Philosophy L
- Generation Why?"
- Happycrow's Eyeball Factory L
- Hold The Mayo L
- Huffington Post
- IMAO
- INDC Journal R
- Iowahawk
- It Comes In Pints?"
- The Jawa Report R
- Just One Minute
- Justus for All R
- Kausfiles
- Ezra Klein
- Daily Kos
- La Shawn Barber
- Libertarian Leanings R
- Liberty Papers
- Carol Platt Liebau
- Llama Butchers R
- Mensa Barbie
- The Moderate Voice
- Broadband Politics
- Mr. Completely L
- National Review Online
- No Angst Zone L
- Normblog
- Brendan Nyhan
- Ogre's Politics & Views L
- One Fine Jay R
- Patterico's Pontifications
- Peter Porcupine L
- Political Calculations
- Radio Equalizer
- Reasoned Audacity
- Respectful Insolence R
- Rhymes with Right L
- Riehl World View
- Right Place
- Right Wing Nut House
- ROFASix
- Samizdata
- SCOTUS Blog
- Roger L. Simon
- Stop the ACLU
- The Strata-Sphere R
- TacJammer
- TalkLeft
- Tempus Fugit
- Texas Best Grok L
- Tigerhawk
- Tinkerty-Tonk R
- Tom Rants RL
- Unalienable Right
- Unrepentant Individual L
- Villainous Company
- Oliver Willis
- Willisms
- The World According to Nick R San Diego Bloggers
- Ducksnorts
- Edward O'Connor
- Inside the Rabbit Hole
- Matt Browne
- Eric Bidwell '08
- San Diego Gaslamp and
- San Diego Home Blog
- San Diego Momma
- San Diego Traveler
- Shy Cloud
- Sociosophy
- Thaumatocracy
- Luke Stardust Link Exchanges, etcetera
- DANEgerus R
- A Dollop of Sour Cream
- Dust My Broom L
- Generic Confusion R
- Grim's Hall
- Heartless Libertarian L
- individ L
- Kesher Talk R
- Leaning Toward The Dark Side R
- Medary L
- Mondo QT L
- Nose On Your Face R
- Pererro R
- Pratie Place
- Random Fate R
- Ravings of John C. A. Bambanek L
- Signifying Nothing R
- The Skwib L
- Tel-Chai Nation
- TF Sterns Rantings L
- Windypundit L Consumer and Research Sites
- Better Business Bureau
- Consumer Reports
- NASD Home
- California Department of Real Estate
- California Licensee Lookup
- California Department of Insurance
- National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
- Do Not Call Homepage
- IRS Charities Search
- Internet Fraud Complaint Center
- SEC Home Page
- Stop Mortgage Fraud
- Report Mortgage Fraud Debunking Many so-called Real Estate Gurus
- John T. Reed Other research
- FactCheck.org
- Babel Fish Translation
- Snopes Worthwhile Web Comics
- Sluggy Freelance
- Day by Day
- User Friendly
- Kevin and Kell It is site policy to list the main page of every site I reference. Sometimes the real world intervenes and I haven't gotten to it yet, or one falls through the cracks on a long post with multiple references. It is also site policy to list the main page of every site that lists this one on their equivalent roll, as well as the main page of all sites that are members of any of the same groups this site is a member of. Please send me an email with a link to the main page of your site if I've overlooked you (dm at the domain name). For the clue-challenged, note that it is a requirement for your link to appear on every page of your site, just like mine does, and I will not link to spam sites. Honor Roll of Sites Banned by Paranoid Repressive Governments: (be the first on your block to submit a link!)



Logical failures (straw man, ad hominem, red herring, etcetera) will be pointed out - and I hope you'll point out any such errors I make as well. If there's something you don't understand, ask.
Nonetheless, the idea of comments should be constructive. Aim them at the issue, not the individual. Consider it a challenge to make your criticism constructive. Try to be respectful. Those who make a habit of trollish behavior will be banned.
Leave a comment